Started By
Message

re: Question RE GT

Posted on 9/25/18 at 11:59 am to
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
71819 posts
Posted on 9/25/18 at 11:59 am to
quote:

I'm not sure that the triple option isn't just an easy scapegoat.

Right not, GT's biggest issue is that they directly compete with Georgia, Clemson, Alabama, Auburn, UF and FSU among others for talent. That is as competitive a recruiting state as there is and GT lacks the same tradition, facilities and has the academic barrier.

Johnson's issues have coincided with those other schools firing up their recruiting. I'm not really convinced a spread with inferior talent goes much better than triple option with inferior talent.


You will never ever compete with those schools, and many others, in recruiting if you're using that offense. According to Rivals Johnson's signed one class ranked above 40, it was 39, and that class consisted of exactly 27 3 stars. Tech has signed one 4 star RB, WR, and OL in his entire tenure. Gailey signed 1 RB, 2 QBs, and 1 WR that was rated as a 4 star in his'07 class.
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
139876 posts
Posted on 9/25/18 at 12:04 pm to
If run correctly that offense you guys are bitching about can not be stopped. Problem is nobody runs it anymore in lower levels so you have QB's that are not mastering it and there are few coaches that can teach the OL play. Look at what Army just did to OU. It does hurt that the conference teams see it yearly and can figure out what the splits mean.
This post was edited on 9/25/18 at 12:05 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram