re: Oh shite, somebody is leaking WAPO emails to WSJ regarding Ford story. Wapo in on smear?

The big take always are:

quote:

---

What, you can't find Keyser? She has lived in the DC area a long time. The paper had no trouble tracking down the other two men (btw, who also denied such party). And why not publish Keyser's name? It published the other men's names.

---

Why didn’t the so called WaPo journalist actually do the leg work and track down Keyser?

quote:

---

In its most recent update tonight, WaPo writes: "Before her name became public, Ford told The Post she did not think Keyser would remember the party because nothing remarkable had happened there, as far as Keyser was aware."

---

Nothing remarkable happened yet now Ford is claiming the event was so egregious that we should not seat a man that has people lining up to support him? Not sure about you guys but if this event had been so traumatic to Ford wouldn’t it be immediately obvious to all parties involved?

quote:

---

Wow. "Before her name became public, Ford told..." That is WaPo admitting that it had the name, and had Ford's response to what would clearly be a Keyser denial, but NEVER PUT IT OUT THERE. Again, why? A lot of people have a lot questions to answer.

---

I am a pretty cut and dry guy. When something smells like shite I say it smells like shite. Couple all this with the fact that Keyser now has publicly claimed she does not know Judge Kavanaugh, this not only smell like, but looks like a hug pile of steaming shite!