re: Judge forces high-schoolers to share showers with opposite sex

quote:

---

This is what kind of stupid logic that is a result of having to use pretzel logic to justify a ruling.

"Parents of freaks who want to use the opposite sex shower have the right to complain , and their children ahve have the right to use whichever shower they want, but parents who disagree have no such right and other kids just have to shower with the opposite sex and deal with it"

---

And yet the same judge will throw out any contractual obligations the same child may have in a court?

Lenders, get thee to the public schools! These kids CAN make valid legal decisions while in attendance. Sell some cars, sell some high end computers, phones, even real estate. (scam guaranteed loans run rampant! Fed Insured Programs run amok! all future headlines)

Kids can make decisions for themselves except in regards to "this" but not "that", legally binding decisions??? So judges get get to pick and choose what children are and are not capable of legally deciding on a personally conjectural basis? They can choose their Identity, their gender, their sexuality but cannot enter other legally binding decisions regarding morals, finances, etc.? How does a Juvenile Court even exist anymore?