Started By
Message

re: .

Posted on 7/26/18 at 2:40 pm to
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124851 posts
Posted on 7/26/18 at 2:40 pm to
Let’s say an IRL 3-4.

If it was an IRL 6-7 it wouldn’t even be a good hypo.

Let’s say this chick could stand to lose a hundred pounds. But she’s got big titties
Posted by StupidBinder
Jawja
Member since Oct 2017
6392 posts
Posted on 7/26/18 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

Let’s say an IRL 3-4.

If it was an IRL 6-7 it wouldn’t even be a good hypo.

Let’s say this chick could stand to lose a hundred pounds. But she’s got big titties


I’m still going with option B.

I’d personally never be happy with option A as you framed it. I at least have a chance with B. If she’s really that into me I’d just get her to go running with me and eat salads and tuna every day. She’d be a solid 5 in no time.
Posted by Steadyhands
Slightly above I-10
Member since May 2016
6845 posts
Posted on 7/26/18 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

Let’s say this chick could stand to lose a hundred pounds. But she’s got big titties


That's breaking a rule there, so it's no longer a valid hypo. Never date a chick that weighs more than you.
This post was edited on 7/26/18 at 2:51 pm
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64600 posts
Posted on 7/26/18 at 6:16 pm to
quote:

Let’s say this chick could stand to lose a hundred pounds.


That’s like morbidly obese. Like biggest loser obese.

This post was edited on 7/26/18 at 6:18 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram