- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Realtor Negotiations
Posted on 7/23/18 at 1:55 pm to lnomm34
Posted on 7/23/18 at 1:55 pm to lnomm34
quote:
My first house, we bought using a dual agent. We were new to the area and no one clued us in on areas that would have been more appropriate for our family. We found a nice house, contacted the listing agent, she showed us the house, and we bought it.
Please don't get me wrong... I'm certainly not defending her, her actions or her attitude. But unless the laws or standards and practices are different in the state where you bought, it doesn't sound like she was legally a dual agent. Had you signed an exclusive buyer's agency agreement with her before seeing the house? You just contacted the listing agent and she sold you the house, right? If so, then her fiduciary duties were still to the seller.
Dual agency usually comes about when someone has signed an exclusive buyer's agency agreement with an agent (legally making that person THEIR agent) and the buyer becomes interested in a property that the agent or his agency has a listing on. Not all states permit dual agency. And the ones that do usually require that both parties (seller and buyer) sign off on disclosures.
But the confusion around this issue is what causes a lot of people to either get burned, or at least feel like they were short changed.
Posted on 7/23/18 at 2:52 pm to Jag_Warrior
quote:
Dual agency usually comes about when someone has signed an exclusive buyer's agency agreement with an agent (legally making that person THEIR agent) and the buyer becomes interested in a property that the agent or his agency has a listing on. Not all states permit dual agency. And the ones that do usually require that both parties (seller and buyer) sign off on disclosures. But the confusion around this issue is what causes a lot of people to either get burned, or at least feel like they were short changed.
Correct. If there is a confirmation of agency status I'll bet agent put him as unrepresented. No way you take on the liability if you don't have to. THey already had 6% locked up.
To OP, If you've got an experienced agent willing to take on rural property for 6% that is fair. Typically there are so many special stipulations and performance date requirements you need a guy who knows wtf he's doing. Raw land is generally not a barbie doll in a Lexus transactions. I've charged as much as 10% on these type deals because the time and work involved was worth every penny.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News