Started By
Message

re: So the DNC Server is Clearly Not Important to the Investigation

Posted on 7/17/18 at 9:46 am to
Posted by tigerinDC09
Washington, DC
Member since Nov 2011
4741 posts
Posted on 7/17/18 at 9:46 am to
quote:

I have no idea - I am only commenting on the logic of the excerpt that Decatur provided. It explains why the images of live data is better (for some purposes) than examining hard drive contents after the fact. Of course it is possible Crowdsrike manufactured the 'evidence' - but that is a different issue. IS there a way to ID the hackers after the fact? after the hacker has come and gone? Is there a way to cipher all this from the hard drive data? I just dont have any idea of how sleuths these internet sleuths are. Envious of those who do.


I can understand the confusion from those who aren't cyber experts.... With that said, what's the point of having cyber experts explain it if some in here won't even believe/trust what they say?

Even aside from the cyber forensics, you have intercepts of the GRU discussing the hack and their actions to clean up after themselves.
Posted by SidewalkDawg
Chair
Member since Nov 2012
9943 posts
Posted on 7/17/18 at 9:48 am to
quote:

I can understand the confusion from those who aren't cyber experts.... With that said, what's the point of having cyber experts explain it if some in here won't even believe/trust what they say?


Because the only way to deal with bias is to have two competeing sides bring their own experts to assess the information.

For all we know, Crowdsrike is "With Her". In order to safeguard from that accusation, we have to have the evidence in front of the experts that both sides have chosen to explain it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram