Started By
Message

re: Could any strategy have worked in Vietnam?

Posted on 7/7/18 at 12:33 pm to
Posted by MizzouBS
Missouri
Member since Dec 2014
5992 posts
Posted on 7/7/18 at 12:33 pm to
Should have started in the north. Made the North Vietnamese Army protect its territory.

The Viet Cong was mainly in the south and in Cambodia. After taking North Vietnam it would have been much easier to defeat the Viet Cong.

Once the Noth Vietnamese army hooked up with the Viet Cong it was pretty much over in jungle warfare.

We studied the Vietnam War in one of my ROTC college classes. That is the conclusion the professor believed(24 years ago).
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
90939 posts
Posted on 7/7/18 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

The Viet Cong was mainly in the south and in Cambodia.


Well, that's where the entire war was except for U.S. bombing in North Vietnam.

This myth the VC were all Southern communists is a lot of bunk, too. Maybe there was a plurality, perhaps, although I doubt it, a slight majority of membership from the South, but a huge number and particularly the leadership were infiltrators sent down from the North via the Ho Chi Minh trail.

On the political side, a hardline Catholic regime in the South wasn't really smart. No question that Diem was our man in Saigon and was a virulent anti-Communist, but
he was corrupt to the core and did not understand his own folks. His successors were increasingly ineffective.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram