- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: .
Posted on 5/4/18 at 9:28 pm to JudgeHolden
Posted on 5/4/18 at 9:28 pm to JudgeHolden
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 5:48 pm
2
Posted on 5/4/18 at 9:41 pm to The Baker
quote:
So I’m guessing you think only one agency should handle domestic investigations?
If not, then who else, besides the marshals, would be best equiped to expand into that role?
Well . . .
If you don’t like the FBI, I guess you could create a new agency. But it’s odd to see a conservative arguing for governmental expansion.
Asking the marshalls to handle investigations is like asking the FAA to handle highways. It’s not what they do.
Posted on 5/5/18 at 6:18 am to The Baker
quote:
by The Baker
That’s fine Judge.
So I’m guessing you think only one agency should handle domestic investigations?
If not, then who else, besides the marshals, would be best equiped to expand into that role?
I think they’ve gotta be judged from outside the Beltway
You seem knowledgeable, who would you suggest?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News