Started By
Message

re: Law proposed to require unanimous decision for felonies

Posted on 4/5/18 at 9:37 am to
Posted by Areddishfish
The Wild West
Member since Oct 2015
6284 posts
Posted on 4/5/18 at 9:37 am to
quote:

He was acquitted, there wasn't a hung jury.


It has been proven that most of the jurors, who were black, voted against conviction strictly because OJ was black and famous. They didn't want another black man in prison. This was just after the race riots in the L.A. area.

Point being, as has been mentioned many times throughout this thread, that people will vote one way or the other based on skin color alone, white or black. So in requiring a unanimous decision on ALL felony cases, I would wager we would see an increase in violent felons in the community.
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
36322 posts
Posted on 4/5/18 at 9:40 am to
quote:

So in requiring a unanimous decision on ALL felony cases, I would wager we would see an increase in violent felons in the community.

To be honest, you're probably right. My issue is where do we draw the line. Is 7-5 ok because it's a majority? And a 10-2 hung jury in favor of conviction in other states doesn't prevent re-trying the Defendant.
Posted by JamesLang
Member since Mar 2018
388 posts
Posted on 4/5/18 at 9:41 am to
quote:

Point being, as has been mentioned many times throughout this thread, that people will vote one way or the other based on skin color alone, white or black.


Which is exactly why the white folks created this 10/12 scheme. To completely silence any influence of blacks on a jury. That was the purpose, and you say that is just fine.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram