- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Soldiers Hate the M4 and M16. The Pentagon Is Finally Doing Something about It.
Posted on 3/5/18 at 5:29 pm to upgrayedd
Posted on 3/5/18 at 5:29 pm to upgrayedd
Mine never malfunctioned in combat
In fact, I can think of very few malfunctions I’ve had with the weapon even in training. And most of those have been from faulty magazines.
I would add that the average engagement distances in Afghanistan have been 300 meters or more so a more powerful round could be useful. But then you run into the problem of weight.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/icons/shrug.gif)
In fact, I can think of very few malfunctions I’ve had with the weapon even in training. And most of those have been from faulty magazines.
I would add that the average engagement distances in Afghanistan have been 300 meters or more so a more powerful round could be useful. But then you run into the problem of weight.
Posted on 3/5/18 at 9:03 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
I trained with the M14. The M16 was just being introduced. Fired both weapons. The M14 was a better weapon.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)