- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If your kid called you from school and said there was an active shooter?
Posted on 2/16/18 at 10:34 pm to buckeye_vol
Posted on 2/16/18 at 10:34 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:I think we should have both.
But I do think it would make more sense, and potentially more effective to have SROs trained to respond. More effective than teachers.
1
Posted on 2/16/18 at 10:43 pm to bhtigerfan
quote:OK. I'm fine with that, and I'm not arguing that. I'm arguing that SROs being trained to respond could be far more effective, and I don't think teachers being armed would have much if an effect anyways.
I think we should have both.
So are we discussing potentially effective solutions, or what you want to see. Because I you're overestimating the effectiveness if you think allowing teachers to carry would have a measurable impact.
So given that you've started multiple threads with variations of the psychological comfort knowing a teacher carrying, I'm not sure if you're just arguing for the validity of that comfort (I'll buy that) or the objective effectiveness of it as well:
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News