- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who was a more questionable hire Mike Archer, Curley Hallman, Gerry DiNardo or Ed Orgeron?
Posted on 2/11/18 at 7:14 pm to The First Cut
Posted on 2/11/18 at 7:14 pm to The First Cut
quote:Now see, this is a strong case. And LSU beat him in Tiger Stadium in one of those losses, on a goal line fumble.
DiNardo was the most controversial. He had 4 losing seasons at Vandy and lost his last game there 65-0.
I don't know though, even though you present a strong case...O seems like it beats out Dinardo in being a questionable hire. LSU now has the money, the facilities, the alumni support and fan interest, and is one of the big dogs of college football, unlike LSU after firing Hallman. No fricking excuse for making that hire.
This post was edited on 2/11/18 at 7:20 pm
2
Posted on 2/11/18 at 7:19 pm to RealityTiger
Orgeron had a sliver of fan support behind his hire; DiNardo had none. Fans warmed up after his 6-4-1 first year, but no one liked the hire at the time.
Posted on 2/11/18 at 7:23 pm to RealityTiger
quote:
unlike LSU after firing Hallman. No fricking excuse for making that hire.
Hallman had big wins over Bama and FSU, there were some expectations that he’d do something. Archer was a horrible recruiter and Hallman walked into a real bare cupboard. Hallman wasn’t a good coach, at all, but he left more talent than what he inherited.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News