Started By
Message

re: Just overheard a guy say "slavery wasn't racist"

Posted on 2/9/18 at 1:19 pm to
Posted by N.O. via West-Cal
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2004
7303 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 1:19 pm to
CT, I think you took me too literally on the quoted sentence and perhaps didn't consider the rest of the post. What I am getting at is that our American paradigm for understanding "racism" is driven primarily by black/white relations in this country. Slavery, followed by Jim Crow, Civil Rights era, and down to the present day. Even our civil rights laws were made to secure rights "for the Negro," with national origin and even gender blended in to the process. Of course, other groups have experienced racism, but when we as Americans talk about "racism," it's the history of black-white relations that primarily informs our understanding.

You seem to have missed that I referred to slavery as an ancient and varied institution. Slavery has existed, and continues to exist, in very different forms, but it's the peculiar institution of American chattel slavery that most Americans think of and it's the reaction to that institution that informs our understanding of racism.
Posted by CarrolltonTiger
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2005
50291 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

CT, I think you took me too literally
quote:

CT, I think you took me too literally ....


Well the plight of the Negro (can't use African American) around the world is pretty much the same in countries where there was never African slavery. So that leads me to beleive what happened almost 200 years ago in the US is not causing the same situation in other countries.

Unless you think racism is unique to the US and countries that had African slavery.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram