Started By
Message

re: Senators: ‘Substantial Evidence’ That British Spy Misled FBI About Dossier

Posted on 2/5/18 at 11:27 pm to
Posted by Hades
Lafayette
Member since Dec 2017
204 posts
Posted on 2/5/18 at 11:27 pm to
Grassley might be telling the truth. I’m open to that but are you open to people being wrong by simply assuming? Example Nunes hasn’t even read the court transcripts on FISA warrant. Don’t you think you might want to get your hands on that before commenting on whether the court knew or to the degree the court knew/ didn’t know about this dossiers source?

Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39724 posts
Posted on 2/5/18 at 11:29 pm to
How many goddam times do we need to explain this stupid arse Nunes talking point?
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23385 posts
Posted on 2/5/18 at 11:33 pm to
quote:

Nunes hasn’t even read the court transcripts on FISA warrant.


This talking point is asinine.

1 majority and 1 minority member of the HIC was allowed to review it. Nunes as chair chose his most seasoned and qualified member to review it. That member attests to the accuracy of the memo.

The memo is not the work product of nunes, it is the work product of the HIC.

You degrade your credibility using such ridiculous arguments.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram