Started By
Message

re: Gasser didn't testify in McKnight case; Guilty of manslaughter

Posted on 1/26/18 at 9:12 am to
Posted by PearlJam
NotBeardEaves
Member since Aug 2014
13908 posts
Posted on 1/26/18 at 9:12 am to
quote:

Is that something that would normally not be allowed?
the general rule is prior bad acts evidence is not admissable, but there are some exceptions. I haven't paid close attention and don't know what exception the judge relied upon, but it seems on its face that the prejudicial nature of that evidence would heavily outweigh it's evidentiary value.
This post was edited on 1/26/18 at 9:13 am
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85487 posts
Posted on 1/26/18 at 9:13 am to
quote:

the general rule is probably bad acts evidence is not admissable, but there are some exceptions. I haven't paid close attention and don't know what exception the judge relied upon, but it seems on its face that the prejudicial nature of that evidence would heavily outweigh it's evidentiary value.


It's one of those things that seems incredibly relevant to the average Joe, but a court of law is a different story. I was surprised it was allowed.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171114 posts
Posted on 1/26/18 at 9:15 am to
quote:

the general rule is prior bad acts evidence is not admissable, but there are some exceptions. I haven't paid close attention and don't know what exception the judge relied upon, but it seems on its face that the prejudicial nature of that evidence would heavily outweigh it's evidentiary value.


It was a road rage incident at the same exact intersection that resulted in the defendant physically attacking someone.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram