- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Do you support local law enforcement being compelled to enforce federal law?
Posted on 1/26/18 at 8:14 am to NYNolaguy1
Posted on 1/26/18 at 8:14 am to NYNolaguy1
So why did AZ get shot down during Obama admin when their citizens voted on a law to have tougher stance on illegals crossing their southern state border which also happens to be the US border to Mexico?
Posted on 1/26/18 at 12:14 pm to NYNolaguy1
If they have to then there should be some kind of task force created to do this and made immune to prosecution by over reaching liberal scum bag politicians. Special training, special incentives, government benefits , special pay etc.
Posted on 1/26/18 at 12:16 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
How can any "small govt conservative" be both in favor of small govt and compulsory enactment of federal law by state law enforcement?
We evolved. Aint that a favorite term for you proggies?
Rhetorical. We know it is.
Posted on 1/26/18 at 12:28 pm to NYNolaguy1
So, if Alabama declares that Abe Lincoln was beyond his authority and therefore they re-institute slavery and start selling Tide football players to do yard work in the suburbs for free (with chains and whips and stuff) then you have no problem with that since the federal govt cannot intervene?
Posted on 1/26/18 at 12:31 pm to NYNolaguy1
Amazing how the OP favors Arizona having to follow federal law and not California. Think that has to do with the fact that the occupant of the white house has changed?
Posted on 1/26/18 at 12:38 pm to Boatshoes
"If you want them come get them, but don't expect us to use our resources." -California
I have zero issue with this. If ICE wants to round them up, by all means foot the bill and go do it.
I have zero issue with this. If ICE wants to round them up, by all means foot the bill and go do it.
Posted on 1/26/18 at 12:40 pm to Usafgiles
quote:That's not what Sanctuary cites are saying.
If you want them come get them, but don't expect us to use our resources." -California
Posted on 1/26/18 at 12:43 pm to Usafgiles
I like the limiting of cooperation in most of the cities.
Posted on 1/26/18 at 12:54 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
Everyone recently has been talking about local law enforcement essentially being forced to enact federal immigration law, but in many ways it goes deeper.
This is false. The laws are already enacted, and no..they are not being asked to enforce federal laws, they are being required to comply with requests for information on federal criminals.
Completely different acts.
Posted on 1/26/18 at 12:56 pm to Dale51
quote:Indeed.
Completely different acts.
quote:
Chicago's sanctuary policies date back to the mid-1980s and successive city councils have confirmed or expanded the protections. The city prohibits police from providing federal Immigration and Customs officials access to people in police custody, unless they are wanted on a criminal warrant or have serious criminal convictions. Local police are also barred from allowing ICE agents to use their facilities for interviews or investigations and from responding to ICE inquiries or talking to ICE officials about a person's custody status or release date.
Posted on 1/26/18 at 12:56 pm to Dale51
They are also being asked to expend their own resources to detain and hold inmates. They feel like they have better ways to use that money.
Posted on 1/26/18 at 12:58 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
Does your state want slavery?
California wants the cheap labor to reap their benefits, so..I guess, yeah. The state of California wants slavery. Why do you support slavery??
Posted on 1/26/18 at 12:58 pm to Usafgiles
quote:Already have a guy in jail, nope you can't have access to him.
The city prohibits police from providing federal Immigration and Customs officials access to people in police custody, unless they are wanted on a criminal warrant or have serious criminal convictions. Local police are also barred from allowing ICE agents to use their facilities for interviews or investigations and from responding to ICE inquiries or talking to ICE officials about a person's custody status or release date.
Posted on 1/26/18 at 1:00 pm to Jbird
I like it. Do it yourselves you lazy bastards.
Posted on 1/26/18 at 1:07 pm to Usafgiles
quote:Indeed, now cut off federal funding.
Do it yourselves you lazy bastards.
Posted on 1/26/18 at 1:10 pm to Usafgiles
quote:
They are also being asked to expend their own resources to detain and hold inmates. They feel like they have better ways to use that money.
So what? They are also expending money and resources trying to avoid compliance. In effect, they are colluding to obstruct justice, using taxpayers money on efforts the people of the state don't want. They need to get Mueller on this. It seems like a conspiracy to obstruct justice and alter what the voters of that state want. Colluding with criminals..straight up! Newsome needs to be impeached.
Posted on 1/26/18 at 1:11 pm to Boatshoes
quote:
Amazing how the OP favors Arizona having to follow federal law and not California. Think that has to do with the fact that the occupant of the white house has changed?
Lol wat? Link?
Posted on 1/26/18 at 1:12 pm to vodkacop
quote:
Aint that a favorite term for you proggies
I think its hilarious you think a person that believes in states rights and limited federal govt is a progressive.
Posted on 1/26/18 at 1:13 pm to Dale51
Nah they just don't want to do their work for them if they don't agree with it.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News