Started By
Message

re: Foster over Goodrich for the following reasons

Posted on 1/19/18 at 12:07 pm to
Posted by airfernando
Member since Oct 2015
15248 posts
Posted on 1/19/18 at 12:07 pm to
problem with the op is that Foster really isn't very good and there's an excellent chance he will never play a meaningful down at LSU. Goodrich is much more likely to see significant meaningful playing time.
Posted by Ltown_tiger
Livonia
Member since Aug 2013
2016 posts
Posted on 1/19/18 at 12:14 pm to
I agree. I say take Goodrich this year and then pick up 2 QB’s next year
Posted by lsufanva
sandston virginia
Member since Aug 2009
12506 posts
Posted on 1/19/18 at 12:14 pm to
Agree. Taking foster just because he's a qb is not smart. We need CBS to play next season. Foster will not play next season unless a disaster happens and if that's the case what's the difference between Foster and any other 3rd guy we have. Take Goodrich if he wants in.
Posted by ipodking
#StopTalkingAboutWomensSports
Member since Jun 2008
56331 posts
Posted on 1/19/18 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

problem with the op is that Foster really isn't very good and there's an excellent chance he will never play a meaningful down at LSU.


If he is no good then why does he have Bama, FSU and A&M all after him?

Who the hell does LSU have that would cause Foster to never see the the field?

Y'all are acting like LSU has the pick of the litter of future QBs
This post was edited on 1/19/18 at 12:19 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram