Started By
Message

re: Our President's attorney's allege illegal conduct by Robert Mueller

Posted on 12/17/17 at 11:16 am to
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99657 posts
Posted on 12/17/17 at 11:16 am to
quote:

But it is enough to show that the claim for complete ownership is bs.


Don't be so sure. If all that was used was a web address (and server) but the equipment was theirs (they ran the transition from Trump Tower as I recall), they may have an argument.

Regardless, it does not address the privilege issues, and the ethical obligations, which are the main point here.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99657 posts
Posted on 12/17/17 at 11:18 am to
Interesting that Mueller calls it an "investigation," and not a "matter."

Also, since it is a criminal investigation (his words), there are procedural steps they must follow, which apparently were not done here.
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35507 posts
Posted on 12/17/17 at 11:34 am to
quote:

Don't be so sure. If all that was used was a web address (and server) but the equipment was theirs (they ran the transition from Trump Tower as I recall), they may have an argument.
All of the equipment that the GSA had was GSA owned equipment.
quote:

Regardless, it does not address the privilege issues, and the ethical obligations, which are the main point here.
The letter only said "susceptible" to privilege. Trump has never invoked executive privilege, and I don't think that can be used to conceal criminal behavior.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram