- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Let’s get this clear once and for all: the internet is NOT a utility
Posted on 12/15/17 at 1:43 pm to bonhoeffer45
Posted on 12/15/17 at 1:43 pm to bonhoeffer45
quote:
If you can't comprehend what was written, be a big boy and ask.
The issue is your lack of effective communication skills, not everyone else's lack of comprehension.
As for discussing how a market can work sans the underlying traits...I would like for you to describe to us which markets currently operate as perfectly competitive markets? Then as we move on to discuss other markets, let's discuss barriers to entry and then let's discuss market share. We can tackle each element you pulled from your shiny new textbook and see exactly which ones you think make ISP so different from any number of other markets.
Finally, if you are arguing on behalf of ISPs being treated as utilities....have you thought through how this would play out?
This post was edited on 12/15/17 at 1:46 pm
Posted on 12/15/17 at 2:04 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
As for discussing how a market can work sans the underlying traits...I would like for you to describe to us which markets currently operate as perfectly competitive markets?
As already stated, very few, but many come close. You see that in food and restaurant industries and a large majority of consumer goods. Few, if any of those markets meet the exact definition of perfectly competitive, but most come close, which is in part why we see it fit to minimally regulate them. Perfect Competition is a construct to understand what an ideal market looks like. Which is all that it was used for in the initial post. Despite the triggered people wanting to dumb down the post to more easily attack.
That is why the vast majority of the post was talking about how the ISP market fares with regards to the underlying characteristics that govern highly competitive markets. When markets severely lack those characteristics you increase the odds of certain types of market failures. Which we see in this space. A space that is often basically a natural monopoly or oligopoly and has been subject to an enormous amount of regulatory capture. Providing a good that is increasingly vital and requires use of numerous shared resources to operate.
The guiding premise of some detractors like Shorty has been that this market is not functionally unique in any notable way to require regulation like NN. That it has adequate competition and choice so it does not necessitate that sort of action. Which both ignores the actual facts of history that led to NN, but more importantly, doesn't align well with the facts. The facts neither you nor he have addressed in terms of the underlying market characteristics. If this market is not unique and thus deserving of a different economic calculus, you have failed to provide ANY convincing case so far. Because from where I am standing, based on the evidence I see, the ISP space is notably different from the vast majority of consumer goods and services.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News