re: I think Orgeron learned a lot this year

quote:

---

So if we go 10-3 it's still a bad hire????

---

You can't possibly need this explained to you again, can you?

From page 6 of the thread entitled "View from a known opponent..." in response to this exact same fricking question from you:

quote:

---

Anyone with any intellectual honest will say yes, because the ends would still not justify the means.

The hiring process that resulted in handing the keys to a man with a sub .500 record will FOREVER and EVER be a shite filled one. If it miraculously works out, that in no way will change what happened, and will in no way become a road map for other Power 5 conference teams to handle their searches. Or are you and other suggesting this will become the new paradigm where programs no longer look for the best resume but search out potential diamonds in the rough who were shitty at their first job because, you know, Ed Orgeron worked out??

Essentially what you're asking is does doing a horrendously stupid thing only to have it work out retroactively make the thing not stupid?

No. The outcome has nothing to do with the process.

---

So...why ask AGAIN if to not just muddy the fricking board with your shite?