Started By
Message

re: NYTimes with a great op-ed on the First Amendment

Posted on 12/5/17 at 10:34 am to
Posted by Cold Drink
Member since Mar 2016
3482 posts
Posted on 12/5/17 at 10:34 am to
Neither do I. Like I said, I believe Colorado is in the wrong here. But I was responding to Martini’s further position that a private business should be allowed to do *anything* they want, and I just don’t agree.

There is a clear difference between catering to a certain demographic and banning anyone from buying there. For example, there’s nothing wrong with having an Afro-centric hair products store. But there is something wrong with them saying “no whites allowed.” I might never have a reason to shop there but I can’t be barred from doing so if I so please. Nor can I compel them to start selling Tea Tree Eucalyptus Shampoo by Paul Mitchell.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171114 posts
Posted on 12/5/17 at 10:42 am to
quote:

There is a clear difference between catering to a certain demographic and banning anyone from buying there. For example, there’s nothing wrong with having an Afro-centric hair products store. But there is something wrong with them saying “no whites allowed.” I might never have a reason to shop there but I can’t be barred from doing so if I so please. Nor can I compel them to start selling Tea Tree Eucalyptus Shampoo by Paul Mitchell.


100% agree
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram