It's good to bump threads such as this one, where certain people hint a certain expertise.

Except the critical dates were posted. In a federal court document. And then you yourself cited dates. And with all of your national intelligence experience you couldn't put two and two together as to why these dates were critical.

Either our national intelligence apparatus is in trouble with respect to the competence of their employees, or you misrepresent your occupation.

In any event, more of this will play out. And probably based on past performance, directly opposite of what you predict.

You wouldn't happen to want to make some market predictions would you?

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Navytiger74

Member since Oct 2009

50458 posts

Posted on 12/2/17 at 6:55 am to Iowa Golfer

quote:
Except the critical dates were posted. In a federal court document. And then you yourself cited dates.

He wasn’t authorized to contact the Russian Ambassdor to discuss the Magnitzsky act, sanctions, UN votes, or anything else anymore during the transition he was during the campaign. The former DNI just highlighted that the conversations were of particular concern to the outgoing admin at the time they happened. And the subject matter and known content of the conversation obviously implied earlier, ongoing communications and overtures. But we’ll get to that soon enough.

A piece of shoddy reporting doesn’t turn this on its head. It’s a big step toward finding out the extent of the campaign’s entanglements with the Russian government and was a bombshell before Ross’ piece even dropped.

You strike me as kind of autistic. Did you like puzzles as a boy? I thought I read that they like puzzles. Anyway, if this investigation were a puzzle, Flynn’s conviction and cooperation would be a good-sized corner piece.

2 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board