re: Roy Moore is Automatically Innocent and Louis CK is Automatically Guilty

Louis CK has been rumored to have been involved in this kind of activity for years. His standup comedy often involves "hypos" of him doing incredibly sick and depraved acts like raping an infant. No one is saying he's guilty, but it sounds plausible.

Roy Moore has been a prominent judge for 40 years. He has been a public figure in the limelight, but none of these allegations come out until he's running for the U.S. Senate after beating an establishment-picked candidate? The allegations are also nearly 40 years old but never mentioned to anyone until now? Never once has there been a rumor of any similar improprieties by the judge up until this point. It's safe to say that the claims seem a little suspect. It's not like it's uncommon for sex scandals to suddenly appear out of nowhere during a federal election and then disappear as soon as the election is over.

This is not a partisan issue, this is a believability one.

I'm going to wait until the facts come out before I condemn either person, but I think that Louis CK being guilty of what he may be accused of seems more believable than Roy Moore being guilty of sex with a 14 year-old girl in 1979.