- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jessica Chambers jury says Not Guilty, but 7 say Guilty on Poll. Chaos in the courtroom
Posted on 10/16/17 at 3:13 pm to anc
Posted on 10/16/17 at 3:13 pm to anc
quote:
I would have a hard time voting 100% guilty. I think he's 90% guilty but there is enough doubt that by the law I could not vote guilty and sentence a man to die.
Isn't there a separate sentencing phase from the guilt phase? Meaning that finding him guilty doesn't necessarily mean you'd have to vote for death.
1
Posted on 10/16/17 at 3:23 pm to Gris Gris
the facebook comments on the pseudo-verdict video are funny
stuff along the lines of "how's the judge going to send them back if they already have a not guilty verdict?"
I know nothing of the case so I don't have an opinion on the actual case
but I know enough that if it's supposed to be unanimous and wasn't... the jury's going to get sent back and told to continue deliberations
stuff along the lines of "how's the judge going to send them back if they already have a not guilty verdict?"
I know nothing of the case so I don't have an opinion on the actual case
but I know enough that if it's supposed to be unanimous and wasn't... the jury's going to get sent back and told to continue deliberations
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News