Started By
Message

re: Supreme Court throws out travel ban ruling.

Posted on 10/12/17 at 6:33 am to
Posted by Old Hellen Yeller
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2014
9423 posts
Posted on 10/12/17 at 6:33 am to
I would hope they wouldn’t waste time reviewing a ban that has already expired and been replaced with a different one.
Posted by CorporateTiger
Member since Aug 2014
10700 posts
Posted on 10/12/17 at 6:36 am to
I said this earlier, this is a really standard procedural action since the ban referenced in the lower court decision has expired.

Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57589 posts
Posted on 10/12/17 at 9:05 am to
quote:

I would hope they wouldn’t waste time reviewing a ban that has already expired and been replaced with a different one.


It's called "setting a precedent."
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram