re: How certain would you have to be to convict?

quote:

---

If you're 99.9% sure the person's guilty, would this meet beyond a reasonable doubt to you?

---

Yes. If you had any reasonable doubt, you wouldn't be 99.9% sure. I'm sure that threshold is different for everyone. For me, there would have to be unresolved ambiguity about a crucial issue in the case. Unresolved ancillary or circumstantial evidence don't create reasonable doubt for me.

Like in the OJ case. I wouldn't give a shite that the gloves don't fit. That was theatre, unless you can find a new pair of those gloves in the same size that wouldn't go on his hand, without the rubber gloves.