- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Give it up, warhawks. NOKO war ain't happening.
Posted on 8/9/17 at 12:20 pm to FooManChoo
Posted on 8/9/17 at 12:20 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
We need to have solid (and I mean 100%) information that they are not just talking trash but are planning an attack with actions behind it before taking military action first.
If they have (2 big Ifs)
1. a legit ICBM
2. a legit miniaturized nuclear payload
Then given their rhetoric about shooting missiles at South Korea, Japan, and America, shouldn't we treat *any* launch as a possible attack?
If someone tries to rob me with a super soaker and a note, I take one action.
If someone tries to rob me with a loaded shotgun, I would react differently, no?
Posted on 8/9/17 at 12:25 pm to Muthsera
quote:Testing ICBMs isn't an attack by itself. Testing warheads isn't an attack by itself. Context and discretion is needed to determine what is and isn't an attack against the US.
shouldn't we treat *any* launch as a possible attack?
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)