Started By
Message

re: Give it up, warhawks. NOKO war ain't happening.

Posted on 8/9/17 at 12:20 pm to
Posted by Muthsera
Member since Jun 2017
7319 posts
Posted on 8/9/17 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

We need to have solid (and I mean 100%) information that they are not just talking trash but are planning an attack with actions behind it before taking military action first.


If they have (2 big Ifs)

1. a legit ICBM
2. a legit miniaturized nuclear payload

Then given their rhetoric about shooting missiles at South Korea, Japan, and America, shouldn't we treat *any* launch as a possible attack?

If someone tries to rob me with a super soaker and a note, I take one action.

If someone tries to rob me with a loaded shotgun, I would react differently, no?
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41870 posts
Posted on 8/9/17 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

shouldn't we treat *any* launch as a possible attack?
Testing ICBMs isn't an attack by itself. Testing warheads isn't an attack by itself. Context and discretion is needed to determine what is and isn't an attack against the US.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram