Started By
Message

re: Give it up, warhawks. NOKO war ain't happening.

Posted on 8/9/17 at 11:29 am to
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67708 posts
Posted on 8/9/17 at 11:29 am to
quote:

When nukes are in the discussion, there is a greater need for restraint because of the consequences. You don't drop "the bomb" and then turn around and say "oops!" later. If we do it, we have to be all-in on it and have no doubt that it is the right thing to do.

I agree
quote:

I don't think capability alone justifies a preemptive nuclear strike by the US. We need to have solid (and I mean 100%) information that they are not just talking trash but are planning an attack with actions behind it before taking military action first.

Here's the dilemma; what if waiting was the wrong strategy? That's why you can't let that psycho frick have the capability to the hit the US in the first place.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
42427 posts
Posted on 8/9/17 at 11:41 am to
quote:

Here's the dilemma; what if waiting was the wrong strategy? That's why you can't let that psycho frick have the capability to the hit the US in the first place
What is attacking first is the wrong strategy?

We have enemies on our side in regards to NK. We have the moral high ground and we can't risk escalating a trifle with NK into a third world war by acting rashly like I now believe we did with Iraq. It would be worse, since we're talking about nuclear weapons with possible (probably likely) casualties to our allies and other innocents even if we attack first.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram