Started By
Message

re: MLS rejected a $4 billion media rights deal bc it required pro/rel

Posted on 7/24/17 at 12:29 pm to
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

Can't wait to see how this is spun

You did the spinning for your side already.

quote:

bc it required pro/rel

Or...

quote:

Those broadcasters have "exclusive negotiating windows and renewal rights," MLS said in a statement on Monday, and thus the league would be unable to consider Silva's offer, no matter the terms.

"As was stated to Mr. Silva both in person and in a subsequent letter, Major League Soccer is prohibited contractually from engaging in discussions about our media rights with other distributors," said Dan Courtemanche, MLS executive vice president of communications.


They hypothetically may have never accepted it because it had pro/rel — they said they weren't interested, but no one knows for sure if it was because of pro/rel — but they turned it down because they were contractually obligated to do that.

However, it made for a good thread title.



ETA: And the guy above me already said all this. This is what you get for writing a post when you're trying to pay attention in a conference call.
This post was edited on 7/24/17 at 12:31 pm
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84961 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

but no one knows for sure if it was because of pro/rel


You're precious
This post was edited on 7/24/17 at 1:07 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram