- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

The Ringer- Juiced Ball is Back
Posted on 6/14/17 at 8:17 pm
Posted on 6/14/17 at 8:17 pm
LINK
quote:
The newer balls have higher CORs and lower circumferences and seam heights, which would be estimated to add an average of 7.1 feet to their distance, equivalent to the effect we would expect to stem from a 1.43 mph difference in exit speed. Although those differences don’t sound enormous, Nathan has noted that “a tiny change in exit speed can lead to much larger changes in the number of home runs.” Last July, he calculated that an exit-speed increase of 1.5 mph would be sufficient to explain the rise in home runs to that point, which means that the 1.43 mph effective difference that Lichtman’s analysis uncovered could comport almost exactly with the initial increase in home runs. Lichtman calculates that a COR increase of this size, in this sample, falls 2.6 standard deviations from the mean, which means that it’s extremely unlikely to have happened by chance.
Posted on 6/14/17 at 8:19 pm to Raghavan
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/8/23 at 5:24 pm
Posted on 6/14/17 at 8:21 pm to Raghavan
quote:
Juiced Ball is Back
God, I hope so. Bring back the mutants!
Posted on 6/14/17 at 8:30 pm to Raghavan
I thought fangraphs did a ton of testing on them and couldn't prove it?
Posted on 6/14/17 at 9:26 pm to Jcorye1
If doctor supervised hgh and roids were legal, ok getting season tickets.
Posted on 6/14/17 at 9:46 pm to Jcorye1
quote:
hought fangraphs did a ton of testing on them and couldn't prove it
That was Ben Lindbergh with the Ringer as well. This is a different testing with a different set of balls that had somewhat conflicting reports with his original article.
This post was edited on 6/14/17 at 9:48 pm
Popular
Back to top
3






