Started By
Message

re: Economics Book Club (EBC): Book 4 Starts Aug 21 (The Smartest Guys in the Room)

Posted on 6/6/17 at 9:20 pm to
Posted by GregYoureMyBoyBlue
Member since Apr 2011
2963 posts
Posted on 6/6/17 at 9:20 pm to
As long as we all keep in mind that this first book is V1 of the EBC discussion forum, we'll be golden. I'd vote that once the period to discuss the book starts, we stick to whatever the set rules are regardless of how the discussion is evolving during the read.

After book 1 discussion is finished, then we can talk about the protocol, how to improve the discussion, role of moderator, pages/week, etc. If we try and change any of that mid-read within the forum it could be confusing to members and be more detrimental to the overall goal.
Posted by RedStickBR
Member since Sep 2009
14577 posts
Posted on 6/6/17 at 10:00 pm to
Great points. To bb88's good suggestion earlier, we can always assess after book one whether we like the TD format or want to take it external. My immediate thought re: protocol is that Monday we begin reading and discussions can commence at will. While I plan to maintain a running outline with notes from all the books we read, I plan to discuss throughout each section and not just hoard it all for the end. Frankly, when I get to something interesting, I'm going to want to come on here and start talking about it. In my view, that's the general idea. By having open discussion early and often, I think we'll all tend to pace together as well. In addition, the moderator would probably also tend to be a pacesetter of sorts.

I've already found some really interesting information on our first author. Goodreads is a great source of supplementary information, as is, in this case, the Mises Institute. I'll be posting some interesting quotes and factoids about Mr. Hazlitt in the next few days to hold us over until Monday.

It might also be useful before we get into this first book to kind of set the stage a bit. We've obviously heard this term Austrian economics and also classical economics. Here are some rhetorical questions to noodle on a bit:

First off, what is Austrian economics? What is it's history and why and when did this movement begin? Presumably, it has something to do with the country of Austria? Who are some of its modern-day mantle bearers? What is its "market share," so to speak, in the marketplace of ideas? What are its primary competing ideologies? What is classical economics?

I don't think we need to necessarily have these answers beforehand, although any of you who know the backstory by all means feel free to enlighten the group. Regardless, I do think it's a good idea to go ahead and contemplate some of the things that will start becoming apparent as we move along.

Finally, I thought our spider chart in the OP turned out pretty much as we collectively planned. Heaviest emphasis on economics, followed by a decently heavy emphasis on finance and then sprinklings of some adjacent topics / subject matters.



first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram