Started By
Message

re: CNN Breaking News: AG Jeff Sessions Failed to disclose Russian contacts

Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:17 am to
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
49050 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:17 am to
Legit obstruction? Ok. I'm game...let's see if you have any knowledge to back this up or if you just regurgitate what you hear. Which Federal Code, specifically do you think Trump is "legit" approaching violating? What are its elements, what are Trump's specific actions that meet those elements? Are there defenses to the Code you cite? What are they and who can utilize them?

I look forward to your insight.
Posted by Ebbandflow
Member since Aug 2010
13457 posts
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:41 am to
quote:

Legit obstruction? Ok. I'm game...let's see if you have any knowledge to back this up or if you just regurgitate what you hear. Which Federal Code, specifically do you think Trump is "legit" approaching violating? What are its elements, what are Trump's specific actions that meet those elements? Are there defenses to the Code you cite? What are they and who can utilize them?

I look forward to your insight.


STFU. There is direct evidence of Trump telling DNI and NSA directors to.....
obstruction 1

“I encountered and am aware of information and intelligence that revealed contacts and interactions between Russian officials and U.S. persons involved in the Trump campaign that I was concerned about because of known Russian efforts to suborn such individuals,” Mr. Brennan told lawmakers on the House Intelligence Committee.

Before Trump fired Comey, a likely conclusion of the Russia affair was coming into view. Flynn would be in trouble for his connections to Turkey and possible violation of the Foreign Agents Registration Act. Former Trump campaign head Paul Manafort would be in trouble for some sort of shady business dealings in Ukraine. Maybe another figure or two from TrumpWorld would get into trouble, as well, but in ways tangential to the investigation. There would be scalps for Democrats to celebrate, but the most consequential issue -- collusion -- would end in nothing.

All that could still happen. But now, after the Comey sacking, the investigation has taken what is for Trump a more ominous turn. Focusing on alleged obstruction, the president's enemies no longer have to find an underlying crime on his part to attempt to remove him from office.

All the while, some Republicans have found themselves asking over and over: But what about collusion? Remember that? If there's no crime at the bottom of the Russia affair, then isn't this just much ado about nothing?

"The answer is no. Certainly, Trump has good arguments to make in his defense, beginning with what legally constitutes obstruction. But after the last two weeks, his supporters can no longer assume that his detractors will have to find an underlying crime to make big trouble for the president."

Washington Examiner conservative news.

Asked Comey if he could count on him...etc.

There is plenty for obstruction and it keeps getting worse.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram