- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why is it Okay to Talk About Trump/Russia w/No Evidence, but Seth Rich is not ok?
Posted on 5/24/17 at 11:25 am to KCT
Posted on 5/24/17 at 11:25 am to KCT
quote:
Trump/Russia w/No Evidence,
Trump campaign advisor and later national security advisor, Michael Flynn, was on the payroll of the Russians and lied about it on multiple occasions, including some on penalty of perjury. That's evidence.
Trump campaign advisor Carter Page had meetings with Russian intelligence officers as far back as 2013 and with Russian officials during 2016 campaign and lied about it. That's evidence.
Trump's then campaign advisor, now Attorney General, Jeff Sessions, had meetings with Russian officials during the campaign and lied about it while under oath during his confirmation hearings. That's evidence.
Even if you claim there was nothing improper about meeting with Russian officials, if everything was on the up-and-up, why did all three of them lie about it, two of them either under oath or on penalty of perjury?
2
Posted on 5/24/17 at 11:32 am to Nuts4LSU
quote:
Trump campaign advisor and later national security advisor, Michael Flynn, was on the payroll of the Russians and lied about it on multiple occasions, including some on penalty of perjury. That's evidence.
Trump fired Flynn for lying. That doesnt prove there was any collusion between Trump and the Russians to effect the 2016 Presidential election.
Are you aware that Podesta made something like $35 million in dealings with Russia? If Flynn's situation supposedly attaches to Trump, which it doesn't, why wouldn't Podesta's situation attach to Hillary?
Let's not have any double standards here.
Posted on 5/24/17 at 12:19 pm to Nuts4LSU
quote:
Trump campaign advisor and later national security advisor, Michael Flynn, was on the payroll of the Russians and lied about it on multiple occasions, including some on penalty of perjury. That's evidence.
Trump campaign advisor Carter Page had meetings with Russian intelligence officers as far back as 2013 and with Russian officials during 2016 campaign and lied about it. That's evidence.
Trump's then campaign advisor, now Attorney General, Jeff Sessions, had meetings with Russian officials during the campaign and lied about it while under oath during his confirmation hearings. That's evidence.
Even if you claim there was nothing improper about meeting with Russian officials, if everything was on the up-and-up, why did all three of them lie about it, two of them either under oath or on penalty of perjury
You realize that it's not against the law to meet with, call, or even do work for or business with Russians don't You? That's why it's all political theatre and bullshite.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News