- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/24/17 at 8:48 am to Salmon
quote:
so no evidence?
cool
And the evidence on Trump collusion with Russia?
Posted on 5/24/17 at 8:50 am to FairhopeTider
quote:
'm saying that you should link the story (that hasn't been retracted) that reports that e-mail links show he was in contact with the FBI and had e-mails on his computer.
Look. I said there was a report. Period.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/icons/shrug.gif)
Now you want to put stipulations?
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 5/24/17 at 8:52 am to Salmon
quote:
You replied to me and said "you guys". That implies me.
Pretty sure if I was saying YOU, I would have said you. When I say you guys, I mean the left.
You is singular and means....you.
You guys, means a group. It is not singular.
Seriously? Basic English.
Posted on 5/24/17 at 8:52 am to DawgsLife
So you agree it was reported and then retracted?
This post was edited on 5/24/17 at 8:53 am
Posted on 5/24/17 at 8:52 am to CorporateTiger
quote:
nothingburger
One of the dumbest terms I have seen used in the last 6 months.
Posted on 5/24/17 at 8:53 am to Salmon
quote:
And I know what circumstantial evidence is. There isn't any for Seth Rich.
Nothing that you just described is circumstantial evidence.
It is ALL circumstantial evidence. tell me...in your mind what constitutes circumstantial evidence?
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 5/24/17 at 8:54 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
One of the dumbest terms I have seen used in the last 6 months.
With over 65k posts on this board, I am incredulous.
Posted on 5/24/17 at 8:54 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
Not nearly as stupid as "muh."
I used it because it should resonate with the bord given how much they say it about Russians.
I used it because it should resonate with the bord given how much they say it about Russians.
Posted on 5/24/17 at 8:55 am to CorporateTiger
quote:
So you agree it was reported and then retracted?
Alright. here is one that has not been retracted. (That I know of)
LINK
Posted on 5/24/17 at 8:56 am to DawgsLife
Well hell thats a reputable news source! (It's not)
Posted on 5/24/17 at 8:56 am to CorporateTiger
"Muh" is right up there.
Wanna know the fastest way for someone to stop reading your posts and discredit you completely? Put "muh" anything.
Wanna know the fastest way for someone to stop reading your posts and discredit you completely? Put "muh" anything.
Posted on 5/24/17 at 8:57 am to DawgsLife
That says nothing about Rich's laptop having emails on it or being in the possession of the FBI.
Posted on 5/24/17 at 8:59 am to DawgsLife
This isn't a discussion about trump's collusion with Russia. But nice deflection
To the extent you assert it is all curcumstantial "evidence," from a purely legal perspective very little of it would come in as evidence. There are facts that would come in then the rest would be ipse Dixit testimony of counsel trying to pull it together into a conspiracy theory.
This would not meet any burden of proof in any court.
To the extent you assert it is all curcumstantial "evidence," from a purely legal perspective very little of it would come in as evidence. There are facts that would come in then the rest would be ipse Dixit testimony of counsel trying to pull it together into a conspiracy theory.
This would not meet any burden of proof in any court.
Posted on 5/24/17 at 9:00 am to UHTiger
quote:
Well hell thats a reputable news source! (It's not)
Man you guys are something else.
I said that there has been a report. You all scream and jump up and down saying the reports have all been retracted. I send a link to one that has not been, so now you don't like the source.
Whether you like the source or not is immaterial to me. I made a statement and it was true. if you don't like it....tough.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 5/24/17 at 9:01 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
With over 65k posts on this board, I am incredulous.
Well, he did say in the last 6 months.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 5/24/17 at 9:02 am to DawgsLife
I mean, your "source" believes Illuminati and Zionist conspiracies are legitimate news, so there is that. ![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 5/24/17 at 9:03 am to DawgsLife
quote:
Look. I said there was a report. Period.
Now you want to put stipulations?
My stipulation was that it should valid report from a valid source to backup your bullshite claim. That's a pretty low bar to cross. Obviously you know you can't so you resort to Clintonian-level dodges.
This post was edited on 5/24/17 at 9:05 am
Posted on 5/24/17 at 9:03 am to DisplacedBuckeye
goldennugget has a website? Look at our little guy go!
Posted on 5/24/17 at 9:03 am to DawgsLife
quote:
Well, he did say in the last 6 months.
The 65k was just a reference to the amount of time he spends here. Surely he's something worse in the last six months if he's spent any measurable amount of time here.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)