- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is there a secular argument against abortions?
Posted on 5/4/17 at 5:18 pm to FooManChoo
Posted on 5/4/17 at 5:18 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
"I don't know" is not an argument or even a guess.
Correct, it's a point, not an argument and certainly not a guess.
quote:
Your comparison is off because you are trying to treat philosophy like the natural sciences when they don't operate the same way.
Wrong. There is commonality that is sufficient for my point.
quote:
Instead of continuing in philosophical discourse
Your continued insistence that only your god could provide objective morality shows that you have no interest in that.
quote:
the Bible
I'm aware, and this is your biggest issue.
quote:
You haven't provided anything specific. You haven't provided a competing idea or argument.
I don't need to. You want to pull me into your mythology to make your point, because it doesn't work otherwise. I won't allow it, and I don't care if that bothers you.
quote:
I claim the existence of an omniscient, unchanging God that has provided an objective moral standard and you equate that with "I don't know".
Correct, and one is as likely as the other.
quote:
You have left a lot unaddressed so I don't buy that statement.
We've had this conversation before. Do we really need to do it again?
quote:
That's simply not true.
It is. Much better than I have done it over and over again.
Posted on 5/4/17 at 5:33 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:Whatever you call it is not sufficient for this discussion. If "I don't know" was a salient point in order to rebut any arguments for the existence of God, it would have received more treatment by the philosophers throughout history.
Correct, it's a point, not an argument and certainly not a guess.
quote:You are trying to compare apples to oranges, like the other poster did earlier in the thread. You want to falsify an idea which cannot be done. You can certainly falsify expected results of an idea, but that hasn't been attempted here.
Wrong. There is commonality that is sufficient for my point
quote:I have put forth a philosophical argument and you claim that it is on part with "I don't know". You haven't offered any defense of your statement as I have or backed up what "I don't know" could even look like in relation to this argument.
Your continued insistence that only your god could provide objective morality shows that you have no interest in that.
quote:I don't believe it is, but even if you're correct, it offers a concrete starting point for what an objective moral law giver would look like. Secularism has no version of "God" that could do the same thing, which has been my point all along.
I'm aware, and this is your biggest issue.
quote:I'm not trying to pull you into anything but an actual discussion of ideas. You are not providing any of your own, just saying that I'm wrong and that "I don't know" is an acceptable rebuttal. I said previously that don't have to believe the Bible is true in order to grant that the God of the Bible would be an objective moral law giver. My argument doesn't require your belief in the Bible as you seem to think.
I don't need to. You want to pull me into your mythology to make your point, because it doesn't work otherwise. I won't allow it, and I don't care if that bothers you.
quote:There are several philosophical arguments for the existence of God. How many are there for the existence of "I don't know"?
Correct, and one is as likely as the other
quote:Apparently so, since you cherry-pick what you want to discuss while not providing any real answer to what you are addressing.
We've had this conversation before. Do we really need to do it again?
quote:Care to provide an example of this? I'm worried that you're slipping into delusion.
It is. Much better than I have done it over and over again.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News