- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is there a secular argument against abortions?
Posted on 5/4/17 at 3:59 pm to FooManChoo
Posted on 5/4/17 at 3:59 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
I've got a worldview based on the Bible
Written by primitive men thousands of years ago. You have no more objectivity than anything I'd offer.
quote:
You aren't providing any concrete basis for an objective moral law giver
Neither are you. That's the point.
quote:
If you'll concede that the existence of God as He's described in the Bible provides for an authoritative basis for objective morality, we can discuss the merits of objectivity versus subjectivity within a moral framework.
Concede that "I don't know" is as relevant to that point as the existence of your god, and I'm happy to.
Posted on 5/4/17 at 4:12 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:It's amazing how insightful it is concerning it was written by "primitive men". Regardless, it claims to be given under the inspiration of God, meaning that its truth transcends whatever primitiveness existed in those men (which isn't much, considering they faced the same general problems we do and wrestled with the same sins we do). And, if that is true that the words, themselves, were inspired by God and thus are as good as if God penned the words with His own finger, then any argument about the human authors is irrelevant. The message, therefore, is what is important and what is the basis for the objectivity, not the humans who put pen to papyrus.
Written by primitive men thousands of years ago. You have no more objectivity than anything I'd offer.
quote:But I have. You don't have to believe it but you can't deny that if it's true, it is most certainly a concrete basis for objectivity, and that's the point I'm trying to make. You aren't providing anything other than contrarianism.
Neither are you. That's the point.
quote:It's not relevant.
Concede that "I don't know" is as relevant to that point as the existence of your god, and I'm happy to.
If you refuse to concede because I won't agree to your nonsensical statements and not because of the rationality of what I have proposed, then you are irrational. If you are willing to concede for the sake of catching me in some sort of argumentative trick, then you are insincere. Either way, you're making a mockery of this discussion at this point.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)