Started By
Message

re: Which War Would Result In The Most Severe PTSD For Soldiers?

Posted on 5/3/17 at 7:24 pm to
Posted by Crusty Juggler
Member since Jun 2013
351 posts
Posted on 5/3/17 at 7:24 pm to
I do think some people are selling the Eastern Front short. 3 out of the top 5 highest casualty count battles in human history are from this front. Like Stalingrad:

Axis:
Strength by Soviet Counteroffensive: 1,040,000
Casualties (killed/wounded): 734,000
Captured: 108,000
Returned Home: 198,000

Soviets:
Strength by Soviet Counteroffensive: 1,143,000
Killed in Action: 478,741
Wounded or Sick: 650,878
Survivors not Wounded or Sick: 13,381
Initial Civilians in the City: 400,000
Surviving Civilians at End: 10,000-60,000

I can't imagine worse than that, really for both sides.
Posted by SCLSUMuddogs
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2010
7010 posts
Posted on 5/3/17 at 7:30 pm to
Agreed. That wasn't even the worst of it for them. The bolshevik revolution was sparked as a result of the war. Russia/USSR had a rough go for a good 40 year stretch
Posted by rmnldr
Member since Oct 2013
38598 posts
Posted on 5/3/17 at 8:00 pm to
The Eastern Front was a meat grinder but the individual experience for each and every soldier was similar to any other soldier in the war. So, while the body count was extremely high, the conditions weren't any worse than what the British in South East Asia experienced.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram