Started By
Message

re: The case against Derek Barnett

Posted on 4/22/17 at 12:34 am to
Posted by bonethug0108
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
12690 posts
Posted on 4/22/17 at 12:34 am to
Not even I am going that far. I'm just sick of the rhetoric that Barnett won't be good because combine.

He has PROVEN he can do it against nfl caliber talent. His 3 cone was great. His production was great. His tape looks great. He didn't rack up garbage sacks or tackles. Great hands. Great body bend.

But starting off he is sorely lacking in pass rush moves and can learn to take a better angle to the QB on his outside rush (too often got pushed past the QB, otherwise his production would be insane).

You teach him a spin move and how to bend the edge and he could be great. As it is he will be at least a solid 8-10 sack guy.
Posted by breauxmosexual
New Orleans, LA
Member since Aug 2016
2526 posts
Posted on 4/22/17 at 12:55 am to
Why barnett at 11 when you can Derek rivers at 42? It's not like this is a hard decision for someone with a brain. Rivers has all those measurables of an ELITE pass rusher plus the game tape. McCaffrey at 11, corner at 32, and rivers at 42 and you're talking about a black and gold super bowl padnas
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram