- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trumps next target - net neutrality say Admin officials
Posted on 4/1/17 at 5:37 pm to StraightCashHomey21
Posted on 4/1/17 at 5:37 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
Literally state and local officials are blocking other ISPs from entering certain markets. Or when a city wants to establish their own, the state blocks it. To ensure the ISPs who payed for access don't have competition.
You're advocating for local governments not to be able to determine which companies can access their infrastructure in their cities? Currently local governments can require certain levels of service to do business in their city. You want to do away with that?
Do you think some random company is just going to go around putting down fiber wires in cities where it doesn't exist? Or are you arguing that the companies who do invest in the infrastructure shouldn't be allowed to capitalize on their investment?
What you are saying here would stifle the advancement of fiber networks throughout most of the country. No company will spend that kind of dough just to have a company come in and undercut them immediately.
This post was edited on 4/1/17 at 5:41 pm
1
Posted on 4/1/17 at 5:40 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
You're advocating for local governments not to be able to determine which companies can access their infrastructure in their cities? Currently local governments can require certain levels of service to do business in their city. You want to do away with that?
Do you think some random company is just going to go around putting down fiber wires in cities where it doesn't exist? Or are you arguing that the companies who do invest in the infrastructure shouldn't be allowed to capitalize on their investment?
What you are saying here would stifle thr advancement of fiber networks theoughout most of the country. No company will spend that kind of dough just to have a company come in and undercut them immediately.
so you are for local monopolies?
You do realize ISPs can share infrastructure...
My town only in Oklahoma only has one option for high speed internet. They charge way to much and have data caps. Thats not free market.
This post was edited on 4/1/17 at 5:42 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News