Started By
Message

re: If Republicans Don't Go Nuclear For Gorsuch, I'm Never Voting For Them Again

Posted on 3/28/17 at 1:27 pm to
Posted by Swoopin
Member since Jun 2011
22031 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

saving the nuke


What does that even mean?

You're either willing to do it or not. The current circumstances, which pretty overwhelmingly favor the Republicans (conservative replacement for a conservative justice) have caused the Dems to bring it to the brink with a filibuster. They're the ones responsible for the use of the nuclear option in my mind, not the Republicans.

The nuclear option seems like a rational response to their antics. Yes, they stalled on Garland which gives a modicum of talking point ammo to the Dems. But Republicans held a majority, they were elected to rule the chamber at the time. That doesn't undo the good faith they displayed by not filibustering Obama's other picks which were predictably left leaning.
Posted by 9th life
birmingham
Member since Sep 2009
7310 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

The nuclear option seems like a rational response to their antics.


I agree, and I am assuming that has to be expected from Democrats. I am sure there is an aim in bringing about that situation, I just am not seeing what that is in forcing GOP to use that option.

I think Gorsuch should be approved, and differ from my party on this issue.
Posted by IceTiger
Really hot place
Member since Oct 2007
26584 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

Yes, they stalled on Garland which gives a modicum of talking point ammo to the Dems.


They were following the BIDEN RULE
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram