- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Police are under no obligation to protect you from harm
Posted on 3/20/17 at 10:07 am to weagle99
Posted on 3/20/17 at 10:07 am to weagle99
quote:
some people believe that if a Trump supporter was about get hit by a criminal swinging a bat, it is a legal requirement of the police to physically step in front of the bat and keep the citizen from being injured (simple example). That isn't how it works from my understanding.
you mean if law enforcement witnessed an incident where a citizen was about to be assaulted and law enforcement was in a position to prevent the assault, that they are not obligated to do so?
this is wrong
only in the event that it might mean certain death, or maiming for the law enforcement officer would they not be obligated
This post was edited on 3/20/17 at 10:13 am
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)