Started By
Message

re: True or False: climate change

Posted on 3/13/17 at 5:24 pm to
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 3/13/17 at 5:24 pm to
quote:



* That actually qualifies as an excuse for getting rid of facts??*

"Your Honor...we don't have the actual evidence...but we do have, what we feel are accurate conclusions, based on what we figgered it meant."


It should have been kept. Irrelevant to this thread
This post was edited on 3/13/17 at 5:25 pm
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 3/13/17 at 5:28 pm to
quote:

It should have been kept. Irrelevant to this thread
It was still kept. Jones is referring to CRU's own storage; the raw data was and still is kept in full by NOAA. LINK
quote:

Refuting CEI's claims of data-destruction, Jones said, "We haven't destroyed anything. The data is still there -- you can still get these stations from the [NOAA] National Climatic Data Center."
This post was edited on 3/13/17 at 5:29 pm
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 3/13/17 at 5:32 pm to
quote:

It should have been kept. I


Should have??? Without it, you can call the conclusions anything you like, but you can't call it science.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram