- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: True or False: climate change
Posted on 3/13/17 at 5:14 pm to Dale51
Posted on 3/13/17 at 5:14 pm to Dale51
quote:
Actually, I think the raw data was destroyed. If this were true, would it change your mind about the validity of the "science" of global warming/cooling/disruption?
"Since the 1980s, we have merged the data we have received into existing series or begun new ones, so it is impossible to say if all stations within a particular country or if all of an individual record should be freely available. Data storage availability in the 1980s meant that we were not able to keep the multiple sources for some sites, only the station series after adjustment for homogeneity issues. We, therefore, do not hold the original raw data but only the value-added (i.e. quality controlled and homogenized) data."
This post was edited on 3/13/17 at 5:15 pm
1
Posted on 3/13/17 at 5:19 pm to bmy
quote:
We, therefore, do not hold the original raw data but only the value-added (i.e. quality controlled and homogenized) data."
Science!!!
* That actually qualifies as an excuse for getting rid of facts??*
"Your Honor...we don't have the actual evidence...but we do have, what we feel are accurate conclusions, based on what we figgered it meant."
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News