- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Boxing Vs. MMA
Posted on 3/3/17 at 11:14 am to winkchance
Posted on 3/3/17 at 11:14 am to winkchance
Yes, even though MMA fighters strike in their sport, so it wouldn't be AS MUCH of a disadvantage as if a boxer had to grapple, but there are still so many subtleties to boxing that it's still a huge disadvantage for an MMAer to "box" against, especially a boxer as experienced as Mayweather.
This post was edited on 3/3/17 at 11:17 am
1
Posted on 3/3/17 at 11:32 am to eddieray
In a strict boxing match I see no way McGregor could stand a chance.
I use to be a Mayweather hater, but after watching his last few fights I see how great he truly is.
Would ya'll say it is easier for a boxer to transition to MMA or someone with skill in Jiu Jitsu or wrestler (grappling) would transition to boxing.
From what I understand, Boxing is the hardest sport to train for, but I do not know.
I'd consider a pure boxer more frightening in any fight outside a ring than any MMA fighter.
I use to be a Mayweather hater, but after watching his last few fights I see how great he truly is.
Would ya'll say it is easier for a boxer to transition to MMA or someone with skill in Jiu Jitsu or wrestler (grappling) would transition to boxing.
From what I understand, Boxing is the hardest sport to train for, but I do not know.
I'd consider a pure boxer more frightening in any fight outside a ring than any MMA fighter.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News