- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Educate me on Climate Change
Posted on 3/3/17 at 8:04 am to Tyrusrex
Posted on 3/3/17 at 8:04 am to Tyrusrex
quote:
You do have to take one thing on faith. Scientists across a vast spectrum of disciplines (Forestry, Glaciology, Botany, Oceanography, Agriculture, Zoology, Geology and many others) are not lying to us that the earth is warming up at an unnatural rate
What does natural rate even mean? Without the influence of man? Here's the last 450,000 years, point to natural warming on this graph.
The willful ignorance on this subject is baffling.
This post was edited on 3/3/17 at 8:05 am
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:47 am to olgoi khorkhoi
quote:
What does natural rate even mean? Without the influence of man? Here's the last 450,000 years, point to natural warming on this graph.
Two seconds to google:
LINK
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:53 am to olgoi khorkhoi
quote:That you think this image is some sort of boom only proves you don't know how to read charts.
What does natural rate even mean? Without the influence of man? Here's the last 450,000 years, point to natural warming on this graph.
Divide 450,000 by 1576 (the pixel width of the graph portion as I just measured in paint) and you get 285.5. Every individual pixel on that graph stands for three centuries.
We've warmed a full degree in one century. That would be vertical with respect to the graph's scale, not simply steep. Plus it breaks the natural cycle illustrated by that chart since we're already at the crest of an interglacial and therefore would expect a slow cooling, not a double bump of even-more-rapid warming.
(The fact that it misspells "anomalies" and is sourced to climatedata.info rather than the actual EPICA paper is also a bit of a red flag, since skeptics tend to "accidentally" frick up baselines and such when "reproducing" these graphs. But I recognize the overall pattern so I'll work with the broad strokes for now.)
This post was edited on 3/3/17 at 9:59 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News