Started By
Message

re: Federal scientist cooked climate change books ahead of Obama presentation

Posted on 2/13/17 at 7:10 pm to
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 2/13/17 at 7:10 pm to
quote:

So I take it you can't debunk the article?


Exactly.

Argument by Assertion Fallacy.
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
32145 posts
Posted on 2/13/17 at 7:55 pm to
With a subject as politicized as anthropogenic global warming, there will be rebuttals and attacks made on whistle blowers. That doesn't mean that said whistle blowers don't have merit.

The article appears to be very inconvenient to some AGW evangelicals that post here judging at the amount of snarky comments we've seen. It takes more than "derp derp...fake news" to debunk the article or the whistle blower.

The article is reporting on an actual whistle blower. The article has not proven to be factually inaccurate. I've seen attacks on the article and on the whistle blower in this thread....but nothing that really debunks what has been reported.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram