- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Patronage Versus Boycotts
Posted on 2/13/17 at 12:25 pm to PurpleandGold Motown
Posted on 2/13/17 at 12:25 pm to PurpleandGold Motown
quote:
Patronage is quiet but sustainable, if the product is good or exceptional. So, I think patronage is better, but you're right that it doesn't make the "statement" an announced boycott does, even if it's forgotten in a few weeks.
Agreed. Patronage is sustainable, but why?
The coffee company will be a wait and see thing obviously. For CFA, I eat there because it's pretty good, pleasant, and I basically grew up with the corporate structure in my backyard and it was always around my childhood. Only after those things do I elect to go there over politics/faith/etc.
I think we should certainly support good companies that put out good products (and take tough stances we agree with). I just think it's harder to use it for advocacy/messaging, because, as you said, it's inherently a quiet act of support.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News