Started By
Message

re: Patronage Versus Boycotts

Posted on 2/13/17 at 12:25 pm to
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
80847 posts
Posted on 2/13/17 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

Patronage is quiet but sustainable, if the product is good or exceptional. So, I think patronage is better, but you're right that it doesn't make the "statement" an announced boycott does, even if it's forgotten in a few weeks.



Agreed. Patronage is sustainable, but why?

The coffee company will be a wait and see thing obviously. For CFA, I eat there because it's pretty good, pleasant, and I basically grew up with the corporate structure in my backyard and it was always around my childhood. Only after those things do I elect to go there over politics/faith/etc.

I think we should certainly support good companies that put out good products (and take tough stances we agree with). I just think it's harder to use it for advocacy/messaging, because, as you said, it's inherently a quiet act of support.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram