re: BREAKING: DHS suspends implementation of travel ban

quote:

---

the word discrimination as we mean to use it

---

You (or is it 'we' who's talking?) are now defining words?

First you dig up a definition for bigot when the discussion was based on your (or is it 'our'?) initial post where you used the word bigotry.

Then you find a definition for the derived word, bigot, which uses "treat/treatment" beyond the context of formal definition to -I suppose- provide the flimsiest of threads to support your gause-like argument that somehow the First Amendment outlaws bigotry from the minds (and hearts?) of US citizens.

BTW, there is absolutely nothing in the etymology or definition of the word bigotry that discusses definitive actions, such as "treat/treatment".

Any such understanding of the word bigotry could only be arrived at by predicating a meaning of "treat/treatment" upon the divination of another's thoughts (mind reading).

For example, 'She assembles only with Christians. She must have a bigotry toward Muslims (the mind-reading happened here). Therefore, her exclusive assembly with Christians is an outward "treatment" of and against Muslims that is a resulting manifestation of her bigotry (previously ascertained by reading her mind/thoughts).' Such tautology!

I divine that your thoughts include a desire to control the thoughts of others.

I'm guessing your next 'project' will be to outlaw prejudice.