- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump's Political Blitzkrieg explained by Scott Adams
Posted on 1/26/17 at 10:19 pm to joshnorris14
Posted on 1/26/17 at 10:19 pm to joshnorris14
quote:Yes. Because while he makes persuasive arguments himself, I can't stand how frequently butchers the very psychological theory he's using to support his arguments.
You've been anti-Adams for a while
Besides, he's like a wittier Paul Krugman; we always know which way he'll twist the argument. That's boring.
quote:Meh. If 80% of presidential elections had larger margins, then either landslides are the overwhelming norm or it wasn't a landslide.
but the Madman won in a landslide
quote:He got it right, but I would think that the "master persuader" would have been able to conjure WAY more than 46% of the vote, especially against a terrible candidate.
like he predicted when nobody thought he would
Posted on 1/26/17 at 10:25 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:I can't figure you out. You fricking disagree with everyone, whether left or right.
He got it right, but I would think that the "master persuader" would have been able to conjure WAY more than 46% of the vote, especially against a terrible candidate.
You are either the most moderate person to ever live, or you're just an a-hole who likes to play devils advocate to every fricking position on earth.
What the frick do you believe in dude? Are you just a fricking troll who wants to disagree with every post you read?
WTF?
This post was edited on 1/26/17 at 10:26 pm
Posted on 1/26/17 at 10:34 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
Yes. Because while he makes persuasive arguments himself, I can't stand how frequently butchers the very psychological theory he's using to support his arguments.
You're smart enough to realize that the credibility of Adam's arguments is independent of his credibility in trying to course correct our political destruction.
If he can affect outcomes positively under the guise of persuasion expert, the critique you're, quite possibly accurately, making becomes entirely misplaced in regards to Scott Adam's goal
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News