Started By
Message

re: DATBL offseason thread: proposed rule change inside

Posted on 12/27/16 at 12:02 pm to
Posted by BackbayDD
Member since Jun 2016
138 posts
Posted on 12/27/16 at 12:02 pm to
I'd rather make more relievers valuable or just scrap relievers all together. If you want to keep RP, replace SV with IP (for example), then you value RP who pitch better over more innings rather than guys who pitch in certain circumstances. Unless y'all are fans of busting your arse on waivers for Kevin Quackenbush and Tony Cingrani.

Realize guy have built their teams a certain way, so maybe not this year but in near future.
Posted by TthomasJR
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2006
17278 posts
Posted on 12/27/16 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

I'd rather make more relievers valuable or just scrap relievers all together. If you want to keep RP, replace SV with IP (for example), then you value RP who pitch better over more innings rather than guys who pitch in certain circumstances. Unless y'all are fans of busting your arse on waivers for Kevin Quackenbush and Tony Cingrani.


I personally am not thrilled about getting rid of Saves.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram